2 Oct 2026
BGC Warns Proposed Machine Games Duty Hike Threatens Major UK Casino Projects

The Betting and Gaming Council issued a direct warning on October 2, 2026 that doubling Machine Games Duty from 20 percent to 40 percent would place more than £200 million in planned UK casino investments at immediate risk while wiping out over £50 million in active projects across multiple cities.
Scale of Investments Now in Jeopardy
Specific developments listed in the warning include an £8 million scheme in Bristol, a £5 million project in Cardiff, another £5 million development in Bournemouth, adn the major redevelopment of Genting’s London Trocadero site, all of which face cancellation or severe scaling back if the tax rate change proceeds. These figures come from operator-submitted investment plans that the BGC reviewed before releasing its statement, and they represent only the portion already at an advanced stage of preparation rather than the full pipeline of potential spending.
One day earlier Genting Casinos had confirmed the permanent closure of its Coventry venue after determining that continued operation no longer met commercial thresholds, an outcome the BGC cites as an early illustration of the pressures already present in the sector before any further tax increase takes effect.
Employment and Tax Revenue at Stake
More than 10,000 direct casino jobs plus an additional 3,700 supported roles stand to be affected if planned investments stall, according to the same analysis. The industry currently contributes £515 million in tax revenue for the 2025 fiscal year, a sum the BGC states would come under pressure should the higher duty rate reduce both operating margins and future capital expenditure.

The proposed duty rise would directly undermine stated government objectives around economic growth and urban regeneration because casino projects typically involve substantial local construction work, ongoing supplier contracts, and footfall that supports surrounding businesses. Data compiled by the BGC shows these investments are concentrated in city-centre locations where regeneration benefits have already been factored into planning approvals.
Timeline and Government Context
The October 2 statement follows standard consultation procedures on fiscal measures affecting the gambling sector, yet the BGC emphasises that the scale of the proposed change exceeds previous adjustments and arrives while several operators are still absorbing the effects of the Coventry closure. Figures released alongside the warning indicate that the £200 million investment total encompasses both new builds and significant refurbishments scheduled over the next three years, none of which include contingency provisions for a 20-percentage-point duty increase.
Operators have already submitted detailed project timelines and costings to local authorities and planning bodies, which means any withdrawal would leave gaps in approved regeneration schemes rather than simply pausing discretionary spending. The BGC analysis therefore frames the duty change as carrying consequences that extend beyond the casino operators themselves to local economies and public-sector partners who have relied on those commitments.
Conclusion
The October 2, 2026 warning from the Betting and Gaming Council sets out concrete investment figures, job numbers, and tax contributions that would be placed in doubt by the proposed Machine Games Duty increase. The statement draws a direct line between the recent Coventry closure and the broader risk facing remaining projects in Bristol, Cardiff, Bournemouth, and London, while highlighting the alignment between those projects and wider government aims for growth and regeneration. All data presented originates from the BGC review of operator plans and the public confirmation of the Coventry closure one day prior.